![]() Interestingly, the “Republican” sounds F, OH, K and W are more common in boys’ than girls’ names (the authors of the study got hold of a list of all the common names in the United States and counted up instances of the sounds in each). Fran k, J oseph, Kate, Kurt and William), while Democrat parents are more likely to choose names that contain the sounds L, AYE, S and TH (e.g. Here lies the clue: Republicans and Democrats like different sounds.Ī 2013 study found that Republican parents are more likely to choose names that contain the sounds F, OH, K and W (e.g. But this doesn’t work very well, as most parents don’t name their kids after other people (and certainly not after politicians) but just go for names that they like the sound of. You might imagine that parents name their children after particular Democrat or Republican heroes or celebrities, and try to think up examples of each among the names listed. Names more commonly given by Republican parents: Frank, Joseph, Kate, Kurt, William. Names more commonly given by Democrat parents: Liam, Ryan, Sam, Thea. (For non-US readers, the Democrats are the more left-leaning party while the Republicans are the more right-leaning party.) Guess whether the people who chose these names for their children are Republicans or Democrats. Try these three questions to test your own knowledge. It’s possible to see how the parties overlap by mapping survey results to our six-party mix.Can you guess someone’s political party based on their name? Can you guess how well someone fights just by looking at his face? In my book, Psy-Q, I explore these and other questions through quizzes, puzzles and experiments that are designed to improve your understanding of both your own psychology and psychology in general. Moreover, a less hyperpartisan Congress will also most likely be less gridlocked and more productive, enabling it to reclaim a more central role in our national politics, lowering the stakes of presidential elections and potentially lowering the stakes for Supreme Court nominations in a new era of reduced partisanship. However, with partisan loyalties less fixed, more voters would judge candidates on the content of their ideas and character rather than the D or R next to their names. Absent reform to the Electoral College, presidential elections would still probably come down to two major candidates. The Senate would most likely become a much more free-wheeling institution, as it was in the past. Multiparty democracy would facilitate the shifting alliances and bargaining that are essential in democracy but have largely disappeared in today’s zero-sum conflict. If more parties emerged, coalitions across parties would form to elect a speaker and organize committee assignments - just as coalitions form in multiparty legislatures around the world. Legislation introduced in the current Congress, the Fair Representation Act, would require use of multimember districts with ranked-choice voting in most states’ House selections as well as elections for the Senate. So more than one party could represent a district in proportion to their popularity within that large district - just as they do in most advanced democracies. This approach features districts much larger than our current tiny congressional ones - and each elects more than one person, at once, to represent the region. We get to such a system through proportional multimember districts. Until American politics nationalized in the 1980s and 1990s around divisive culture-war issues, they operated more independently within the two major political parties. These six parties reflect the underlying factions - and divides - within the Democratic and Republican parties. They will find a home in either the New Liberal Party or the Growth and Opportunity Party. Many readers who consider themselves centrist might also think of themselves as socially liberal/fiscally moderate or socially moderate/fiscally conservative. That is because there are very few voters in the middle across all issues. Each party represents a different portion of the electorate, not only ideologically but also by economic class and political engagement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |